Taphonomy
is
the study of what happens to an organism
after its death and until
its discovery as a fossil. This includes
decomposition, post-mortem
transport, burial, compaction, and other
chemical, biologic, or
physical activity which affects the
remains of the organism. Being able
to recognize taphonomic processes that
have taken place can often lead
to a better understanding of
paleoenvironments and even life-history
of
the once-living organism.
|
|
Taphonomy is the subsection of Paleobiology that
studies this
transmutation of the biological into the
lithosphere. It is concerned
with, “processes between death, decay,
decomposition, transportation
and burial.” (Cadée, 1991) The concept was
critical to understanding
Florissant's stumps because the paleo-history of
its diagenetic
transformation helps explain silicified wood
performance and
pathologies. The story of Florissant’s fossil
forest begins with the
violent burial of a Sequoia affinis paleo-forest
resulting from a
volcanic mudflow, or lahar, as well as subsequent
wet/dry cycles of
submerging in water and desiccation which likely
caused organic
materials to alternately rot and silicify. As part
of the geological
record, these silicifying stumps likely underwent
pressures,
fracturing, secondary mineralization, and seismic
trauma since the late
Eocene Epoch (~35.1Ma).
|
|
|
The
stumps
at Florissant, were first described in 1876 by
Leo Lesquereux, a
Swiss bryologist and a pioneer of American
paleobotany, as Sequoia
affinis based on cones and foliage alone. This
type of tree was renamed
Sequoioxylon pearsalli in 1936 based on the wood
by Henry Nathaniel
Andrews, an American paleobotanist recognized as
an expert in plants of
the Devonian and Carboniferous periods.
University of California Museum
of Paleontology research associate Harry D.
MacGinitie who, beginning
in the 1930's, provided the most comprehensive
modern account of the
Florissant paleoflora, was responsible for
synonymising these names.
The suffix –oxylon means ‘-bearing an affinity
to’ any preceding
subject, in this instance the Sequoia genus, or
sub-family
Sequoioideae. 35 million years of evolution has
probably created many
differences between Sequoia affinis and the sole
survivor of the
Sequoia genus, Sequoia sempervirens. Meyer has
postulated that Sequoia
affinis could be ancestral to both the coastal
redwood, Sequoia
sempervirens, and the Sierra Nevada’s Giant
Sequoia, Sequoiadendron
giganteum.
|
|
|
Fossilised
branches of Sequoia affinis, #3547
University of California Museum of
Paleontology. (Source: UCMP Research
Associate Harry D. MacGinitie,
1953) |
|
|
|
|
|
Considering
the global geological timeline, the continental
arrangement during the
Eocene was relatively similar to today, but the
paleoclimate was
radically different. CO2 levels have
been inferred at six
times the
current level and global mean average temperatures
were on average
25°-30° Celsius. This warm wet climate allowed
Sequoia affinis, an
analogue of the contemporary coastal redwood,
Sequoia sempervirens, and
Giant Sequoia of the Sierra Nevada, Sequoiodendron
giganteum, to
flourish in what is now a dry and cold climate in
central Colorado. The
violent mudflow likely scoured bark away, named
girdling by arborists,
killing the tree above. With later lahar
deposition a lake formed in
the Florissant Paleovalley, which likely began
silicification processes.
|
|
|
|
|