Soft Capping of Archaeological Masonry Walls
Alex Lim
Archaeological sites account for a large percentage of the world’s cultural heritage,
and they rank among the most at risk from natural and human threats. The protection of exposed masonry walls and other architectural features depends ultimately on control of moisture, temperature fluctuations, and movement. Exposed compound walls traditionally have been protected by hard cappings of lime, cement, and modified soil mortars. However, hard capping has been found to be inadequate in addressing the long-term management of moisture ingress and thermal movement that will continue to stress and damage masonry walls. Instead of protecting the wall as initially designed, hard capping can actually accelerate deterioration over time. Moreover, such approaches to stabilization and display have been challenged by culturally affiliated groups (e.g., Native American tribes) as to their insensitivity to the environment. In order to counter such problems posed by hard capping, a procedure called 'soft capping' has been introduced in recent years at several archaeological sites in England, Turkey and elsewhere. Soft capping replaces hard caps with vegetation planted on top of layers of soil, gravel, and geosynthetics. The idea is to prevent water penetration and to reduce thermal fluctuations by taking advantage of plants' abilities to utilize the water and provide a protective barrier on the wall top. The concept is very similar to green roof technology that has gained increased popularity in recent years. This thesis presents laboratory and field-based research conducted on the performance characteristics of soft capping for the exposed masonry walls at Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado. Wall movement, moisture and temperature as well as environmental conditions were monitored to evaluate the effects of hard and soft-capping on the test walls. |